Another Suspicious Legal Filing To Scrub Negative Articles From Google – Attorney Daniel Warner On Behalf Of Mike Meisenbach

0
539

In 2014, Case# CV2014-000834, Attorney Daniel Warner filed a complaint on behalf of Mike Meisenbach and received a permanent injunction order to remove this negative article from Google  http://portlandvalentine.tumblr.com/post/110613460446/truth-is-a-defense-to-libel. The details of the notice to Google can be found here: https://www.lumendatabase.org/notices/12872710#.

The poster of the above link has the screen name “MerryMisslissie” and in the post MerryMisslissie clearly states “I also had a post about him that mysteriously disappeared sometime over the last year or so.”

In the post it is clear that MerryMisslissie is confounded as to how posts are disappearing about Mike Meisenbach as she claims to have had important public alerts up about Mike Meisenbach alleged sex assaults.

 

 

**Update 7-24-17**

Careful readers will notice that these 3 links are involved in both cases below, which leads us to wonder who was responsible, Jill Riva or Amanda Brooks for the content on these links.

escortassistantandgirlfriday.blogspot.com

TexasGoldenGirl.com

Feministe.us

 

CASE 1

  • CV2014–000834  Michael Meisenbach v. Jill Riva
  • Honorable J. Richard Gama
  • 4/30/14 – Date of Case
  • 5/1/14 – Filed Electronically
  • Amended Stipulated Order for Permanent Injunction

Jill Riva
4520 Tournament Drive., Apt. 301
Raleigh, NC 27612
Pro Per Defendant
375 Links Total For Removal

WARNER_MEISENBACH_RIVA-min

 

Case 2

  • CV2014- 001528 Michael Meisenbach v. Claudia Castillo AKA Amanda Brooks
  • Honorable David W. Garbanno & Honorable Benjamim E. Vatz
  • 11/19/14  Default Judgement Signed by Honorable Benjamin E. Vatz
  • 11/10/16 Amended Order For Injunction Filed signed by Honorable David W. Garbanno

WARNER_MEISENBACH_CASTILLO-min

 

**Update 7-20-17**

We are also looking into these cases filed by Attorney Aaron Kelly, all of which aim to remove negative content from Google:

https://www.lumendatabase.org/notices/13996733 (another “pro se” defendant that agreed to the stipulation).

https://www.lumendatabase.org/notices/14188811 (claims that 9 defendants were properly served to remove negative information from Google but none of them decided to answer).

https://www.lumendatabase.org/file_uploads/files/4255692/004/255/692/original/Default%20Judgment%20–%20SIGNED-stuart%20millheiser.pdf?1491603470 (one the links here is from a well known publisher in the reputation management industry: http://badforpeople.org/tag/stuart-millheiser-reviews/.  Apparently the alleged poster here was served legally too but decided not to answer, resulting in another default order….)

https://www.lumendatabase.org/notices/14115366  (Yet another case where the defendants were allegedly served but didn’t respond, resulting in a default….)

https://www.lumendatabase.org/notices/14189032

 

More details to come around this filing and more filings.

To read previous Kelly Warner Law Firm articles that we’ve covered visit this link:  http://usaherald.com/?s=kelly+warner