In a scathing retort, Wolfson posited that Gutmann’s quest for disclosure was baseless, emphasizing Apple’s adherence to disclosure mandates.
In his perspective, Gutmann’s crusade failed to unearth incriminating documents simply because they were non-existent.
In the legal coliseum, with Monckton Chambers’ Anneli Howard KC championing Gutmann and Covington & Burling LLP’s David Wolfson KC shielding Apple, only time will tell who emerges victorious in this high-stakes confidentiality chess match.
