FOLLOW US

In a startling twist of events, Connecticut's highest court has dealt a decisive blow to Frontier Communications' appeal of a trial court's ruling concerning a $21.8 million prejudgment remedy request. The legal battle revolves around former CEO Leonard Tow's claim regarding company tax payments on life insurance policies, and it has captured the attention of legal enthusiasts.

Frontier Communication Appeal of Trial : Chief Justice's Terse Denial

The Connecticut Supreme Court made its final ruling public on Monday, concluding the appeal that had kept the legal world on edge. Chief Justice Richard A. Robinson's refusal to accept Frontier's application for a certified appeal came as a shock to many. Under Connecticut law, such appeals are typically granted when substantial public interest is at stake. However, in this case, the court ruled that the issue at hand did not meet this criteria.

A Legal Maneuver Unfolds

Frontier had raised a substantial challenge to Tow's Connecticut-based request to attach $21.8 million in company funds to secure a hypothetical future arbitration win in New York. Tow, who had initiated arbitration against Frontier in New York on June 20, 2023, was seeking to ensure the company continued paying taxes on multi-million dollar life insurance policies.

A Unique Prejudgment Remedy Request

Connecticut's prejudgment remedies, known as PJRs, are extraordinary attachment requests that require only an assertion that the party is likely to win the case. A hearing follows to determine if probable cause is established, allowing parties to secure assets or funds to guarantee their adversary's ability to pay a potential judgment.

Judge Trial Referee Edward T. Krumeich initially ruled on whether Tow could exercise Connecticut's PJR statute, a question based on the forum and law selection clauses in the arbitration agreement. Tow's age, 95, was cited as a possible reason for Frontier's appeal by the former CEO, who maintained that Frontier's move was merely a delay tactic.

Frontier Communication Appeal of Trial : Long-Standing Dispute

The legal dispute between Tow, who served as CEO of Citizens Communications, a predecessor to Frontier, from 1990 to 2004, and Frontier revolves around life insurance policies totaling nearly $96 million, which both parties shared the costs and benefits of.

For years, Frontier reimbursed Tow for taxes on these policies. However, the company halted these payments in 2021, alleging excessive costs. Tow asserts that Frontier ceased payments simply because he outlived the company's expectations.

Tow is seeking $17.7 million, along with 9% interest, attorney fees, and additional costs. His PJR request is focused on securing a court-ordered fee on $21.8 million of the company's assets.

Frontier Communication Appeal of Trial : An Ongoing Battle

Frontier conducts business in Connecticut, although it recently relocated its headquarters from the Constitution State. Despite these significant developments, the legal battle between Tow and Frontier continues to captivate legal observers.

Legal Teams Unresponsive

At the time of this article's publication, legal representatives for both Tow and Frontier had not responded to inquiries from Law360.

Tow is represented by Brian J. Wheelin and Joseph L. Clasen of Robinson & Cole LLP, while Frontier is represented by Matthew D. Ingber and Kevin C. Kelly of Mayer Brown LLP and Calvin K. Woo and Kristen G. Rossetti of Verrill Dana LLP.

Frontier Communication Appeal of Trial : In Conclusion

The Connecticut Supreme Court's denial of Frontier Communication's appeal in the trial battle with Leonard Tow leaves many questions unanswered and sets the stage for further legal proceedings. This enthralling legal saga, marked by complex jurisdictional challenges, remains far from its conclusion.