FOLLOW US

True crime has become one of the most popular genres in entertainment. It draws millions of viewers, readers and listeners into real-life stories involving murder, serial killers, missing persons, criminal investigations and courtroom battles.

From documentary series such as Making a Murderer and The Staircase to podcasts examining unsolved cases, true crime offers a compelling look at human behavior, criminal investigations and the search for justice.

Experts caution that while the genre can be entertaining and empowering, sensationalized portrayals of violence may also distort perceptions of personal safety and contribute to victim-blaming narratives.

The growing popularity of true crime raises an important question: Why are so many people fascinated by disturbing stories about real crimes, and when might consuming this content become unhealthy?

What Is the True Crime Genre?

True crime is a nonfiction genre that examines actual criminal cases, the people involved, the evidence gathered by investigators and the legal proceedings that follow.

Stories may focus on solved murders, unsolved disappearances, serial killings, fraud, wrongful convictions, criminal psychology or major investigations that changed law enforcement practices.

Unlike fictional mysteries and horror films, true crime draws on real events and real people. Documentaries, books, television programs, newspaper investigations and podcasts may use police records, court documents, interviews, forensic evidence and firsthand accounts to reconstruct what happened.

Popular productions such as Making a Murderer, The Staircase, Wild Wild Country and Tiger King demonstrate the genre's range. Although some productions concentrate on violent crimes, others explore controversial legal cases, criminal allegations, cults, fraud and unusual events involving public figures.

The genre can also serve an educational purpose by examining investigative techniques, the criminal justice system, forensic science and the consequences of crime. However, the accuracy and fairness of individual productions can vary, making it important for audiences to distinguish verified evidence from speculation, dramatization and opinion.

Why Is True Crime So Compelling?

True crime combines several elements that make compelling storytelling: suspense, unanswered questions, complex personalities, unexpected developments and the possibility of discovering how a case was solved.

For many fans, following an investigation creates a sense of participation. Listeners and viewers may examine timelines, compare witness statements and consider evidence alongside investigators. Unsolved cases can be particularly compelling because the central questions remain unanswered.

Another possible explanation is catharsis, or the experience of processing difficult emotions in a controlled environment. Watching a documentary or listening to a podcast allows audiences to encounter fear, sadness, anger and uncertainty without directly experiencing the events being described.

Emily Dworkin is a trauma researcher and assistant professor in the University of Washington School of Medicine's Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences. She has explained that enjoying difficult emotions in safe settings can be a normal human experience.

Similar experiences occur when people watch horror movies, ride roller coasters or view emotionally intense dramas.

For some audiences, true crime also provides an opportunity to learn about criminal behavior, evaluate evidence and consider broader questions about justice and accountability.

The Dark Side of True Crime

Despite its appeal, true crime can create misleading impressions about the likelihood and nature of criminal victimization.

The most dramatic cases often receive the greatest attention, particularly serial murders, stranger attacks and disappearances involving extensive media coverage. These cases can make rare crimes appear more common than they are.

According to research and crime statistics discussed by the Pew Research Center, most reported crimes in the United States are not sensational murders or serial killings. Property crimes, including theft and burglary, account for a substantial share of reported offenses. Among violent crimes, assault and robbery are more common than murder.

Many victims of violent crime also know the person responsible. A steady diet of stories about anonymous strangers committing horrific acts may therefore leave audiences with an incomplete picture of real-world risks.

True crime coverage has also historically devoted substantial attention to crimes involving white women while giving less visibility to violence affecting Black women, Indigenous women and transgender people, including transgender women of color. This imbalance can shape which victims receive public attention and which cases remain overlooked.

Victim Blaming and the Perception of Safety

Another concern involves victim blaming. Some true crime productions devote considerable attention to what victims wore, where they went, whom they trusted or why they made particular decisions before an attack.

Examining a victim's actions with knowledge of the outcome can create the misleading impression that the crime could have been prevented if the person had behaved differently. In reality, people make decisions based on the information available to them at the time, and different decisions do not guarantee different outcomes.

The responsibility for a crime belongs to the perpetrator, not the victim or survivor.

Repeated exposure to sensationalized stories can also lead some viewers to become unnecessarily fearful of ordinary activities, such as traveling alone, walking to a parked car or spending time in unfamiliar places. Taking reasonable precautions is sensible, but fear that interferes with daily life may indicate that the content is affecting a person's perception of risk.

Can True Crime Be Helpful?

True crime is not inherently harmful, and enjoying it does not automatically indicate a psychological problem.

For some people, the genre provides an opportunity to confront difficult emotions, explore questions about justice or learn about experiences that are otherwise unfamiliar. Survivors may also find stories about investigations, accountability and successful prosecutions meaningful or empowering.

Responsible consumption, however, requires critical thinking. Audiences should consider whether a program distinguishes allegations from established facts, treats victims respectfully and acknowledges uncertainty when evidence is incomplete.

Viewers can also ask whose stories are being told, whose experiences are missing and whether the production relies on stereotypes or unsupported conclusions.

If true crime begins causing persistent anxiety, disrupting sleep or encouraging someone to avoid ordinary activities, taking a break may help. Choosing investigative reporting that emphasizes evidence, victim advocacy and the criminal justice process over graphic details can also provide a more balanced experience.

Ultimately, the goal is not to abandon a genre that millions enjoy but to approach it thoughtfully, recognizing the difference between compelling entertainment and an accurate understanding of crime.

For More Information

University of Washington's Right as Rain: Horror Movies and Mental Health — explores the appeal of frightening entertainment.

University of Washington's Right as Rain: Using Genealogy DNA to Solve Crimes — examines the role of genetic genealogy in investigations.

Apple Podcasts: True Crime Charts — discover more podcasts in the genre.

Apple Podcasts