FOLLOW US

In a legal twist that rivals a high-stakes poker game, a New Jersey law firm is seeking a whopping $29,000 in attorney fees after securing a $10,000 settlement in a debt collection case that involved alleged predatory practices. Marcus & Zelman LLP, which successfully represented Anne Hameed, has left the courtroom buzzing with its bold request, which is nearly three times the settlement amount. But is this a legal gamble that will pay off?

Marcus & Zelman Seeks $29K in Attorney Fees : A Bold Request

Marcus & Zelman LLP, fresh from their recent victory on behalf of Anne Hameed, is now aiming for a much larger prize. In their fee request filed Monday, they argue that despite the simplicity of the case, substantial attorney involvement and litigation were necessary. This, they contend, justifies their staggering demand.

The Numbers Game

The law firm's request amounts to $29,000 in fees, meticulously tabulated from over 59 hours of combined work by two attorneys. To add a layer of complexity, they're also seeking reimbursement for approximately $1,600 in filing and transcription costs, pushing the grand total above the $30,000 mark.

Marcus & Zelman Seeks $29K in Attorney Fees : The Backstory

The legal saga began in August 2022 when Anne Hameed accused Parsippany-based firm Fein Such Kahn & Shepard PC of launching a deceptive medical debt collection scheme. Hameed claimed the firm tried to collect thousands of dollars in medical debt that her insurance had already covered. The situation escalated when they sued her and placed a levy on her finances, emptying her bank account. Hameed took action under the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act.

After a month-long battle, Hameed and Fein Such reached a $10,000 settlement on October 5, with Marcus & Zelman now angling for a larger slice of the pie.

Legal Victory or Legal Gambling?

The law firm is steadfast in its belief that Anne Hameed is the triumphant party. They argue that despite statutory damages being capped at $1,000 in any Fair Debt Collection Practices Act case, Hameed walked away with $10,000 in damages. This, they claim, undeniably establishes her as the winner.

Facing the Challenge

While their requested fees appear to dwarf the settlement, Marcus & Zelman maintains that their billing practices are beyond reproach. They emphasize that there is no double-billing or redundancy in document review, asserting that their fees are justified by the extensive time and attention required to navigate the case.

Marcus & Zelman Seeks $29K in Attorney Fees : The Opposing Side

Fein Such Kahn & Shepard, the defendant in this legal showdown, has yet to respond to the bold fee request, leaving the courtroom spectators in suspense.

Marcus & Zelman Seeks $29K in Attorney Fees : Key Players

Anne Hameed's interests are represented by Yitzchak Zelman and Ari Hillel Marcus, the formidable legal team behind her.

Fein Such Kahn & Shepard is represented by its own Gregg Philip Tabakin.

Intriguing Legal Drama Continues

The case, known as Hameed v. Fein Such Kahn & Shepard PC, unfolds in the U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey, promising further legal fireworks and an ending that remains as mysterious as the world of high-stakes gambling.