FOLLOW US

A legal scramble unfolded Wednesday as education advocates raced to court in a last-ditch effort to halt the sudden loss of $60 million for Illinois after-school programs, funding cuts they warn could gut extracurricular learning across the state.

The federal reductions are scheduled to take effect Thursday, Jan. 1, a timing critics say lands like a trapdoor beneath thousands of students just as they return from winter break.

Duelling Courtrooms, One High-Stakes Fight

Lawyers for Illinois education groups made their case before a judge Thursday morning in Washington, D.C., with the U.S. Department of Education defending the cuts. At the same time, a separate lawsuit was argued in U.S. District Court in Chicago.

By midday, the Chicago hearing was placed on an extended recess while the judge reviewed arguments from plaintiffs’ attorneys, underscoring the urgency and complexity of the dispute.

At issue is grant funding for 32 Illinois schools, including Marie Sklodowska Curie Metropolitan High School at 4959 S. Archer Ave. The money supports programs such as STEM and robotics classes, civic leadership initiatives and financial literacy education.

If the Department of Education’s decision stands, many of those activities would be canceled midyear, with layoffs likely for staff who run the programs.

Push to Freeze the Cuts

Attorneys for the Illinois advocates are asking judges to temporarily block the funding cuts, arguing the move was unlawful and executed without proper process. Government lawyers countered that the Department of Education has already reassigned the funds to other grantees.

Illinois organizations were notified on Dec. 12 that their annual grants — totaling $18.5 million — would not be renewed for 2026, 2027 or 2028, despite earlier plans indicating continued funding.

A federal spokesperson said diversity and equity concerns drove the decision. Madi Biedermann, deputy assistant secretary for communications at the Department of Education, said many programs “use overt race preferences or perpetuate divisive concepts and stereotypes, which no student should be exposed to.”

Advocates Reject Federal Rationale

Education leaders in Illinois sharply disputed that explanation.

“These funds are going into communities that for generations have been denied access and opportunities because of racism,” said Monique Redeaux-Smith of the Illinois Federation of Teachers. She said the use of civil rights language to justify the cuts to Black and brown communities was particularly troubling.

Appeals by Illinois grant administrators were denied by the Department of Education, pushing the dispute into the courts. Two lawsuits were filed this week.

One, filed Monday in U.S. District Court in Washington, D.C., was brought by the American Federation of Teachers and the Brighton Park Neighborhood Council. The second was filed the same day in U.S. District Court in Chicago by Afterschool for Children and Teens Now (ACT Now) and Metropolitan Family Services.

“There’s a process to do it,” said Patrick Brosnan, executive director of the Brighton Park Neighborhood Council. “They refuse to follow any process because they think they can just change the rules whenever they want. That’s not how it works in a democracy. These are congressionally appropriated funds.”