FOLLOW US

Case Intel

• A Placer County jury convicted ex-MLB pitcher Dan Serafini of first-degree murder, attempted murder, and first-degree burglary in the 2021 Lake Tahoe attack on his in-laws. Placer County
• Prosecutors are seeking life without parole, plus 50 years; sentencing is scheduled for today, Aug. 18, in Auburn, California.
• Defense filings ask to delay sentencing and request a new trial, citing alleged juror misconduct and a lengthy probation report. KCRA

By Samuel Lopez – USA Herald

AUBURN, Calif. — The law is about to render its final word on one of Lake Tahoe’s most chilling family crimes. Today, former Major League pitcher Dan Serafini faces a potential sentence of life in prison without the possibility of parole for the 2021 ambush that left his father-in-law dead and his mother-in-law gravely wounded at their West Shore home. KCRAAP News

Jurors in mid-July returned guilty verdicts on first-degree murder, attempted murder, and first-degree burglary. They also found true special-circumstance allegations, including lying in wait and felony murder—findings that expose Serafini, 51, to California’s harshest noncapital penalty.

Prosecutors told the jury the former left-hander harbored deep animus toward his wife’s wealthy parents and had said he was willing to pay $20,000 to have them killed. Evidence also spotlighted a deteriorating family relationship punctuated by hostile messages and disputes over a $1.3 million loan tied to a horse-ranch venture.

The crime unfolded on June 5, 2021, at the couple’s Tahoe-area home. Robert Gary Spohr, 70, was fatally shot. His wife, Wendy Wood, 68, survived the gunshot and underwent extensive rehabilitation; she later died, with multiple outlets reporting it was by suicide in 2023.

Inside the Trial

The Placer County District Attorney’s Office tried the case with Assistant Chief Deputy District Attorney Richard Miller leading the prosecution. The jury heard about the financial pressures and the family discord, along with surveillance clips and digital evidence that, prosecutors argued, placed the plan and motive squarely at Serafini’s feet.

The defense, led at trial by attorney David Dratman, argued there was no physical evidence tying Serafini to the scene. They pointed jurors to home-security footage of a masked intruder who, the defense contended, appeared younger and smaller than the former pro athlete. In closing, Dratman underscored that the in-laws had been generous to Serafini and his wife—“Does that provide a motive for murder? That’s killing the golden goose.” Court TVABC 10 News San Diego KGTV

Jurors acquitted Serafini of a separate child-endangerment charge.