Behind the Veil
- A second New Mexico judge lands in hot water, just weeks after Judge Cano’s shocking arrest.
- Judge Susan Griffin found guilty of abusing her power as a landlord, falsifying documents, and lying about court clerks.
- Despite damning misconduct findings, the New Mexico Supreme Court allows her to remain on the bench, raising serious concerns about judicial accountability.
By Samuel Lopez – USA Herald
While New Mexico reels from the arrest of Judge Joel Cano for harboring a gang member, another bombshell has emerged. This time, it’s Catron County Magistrate Judge Susan Griffin who stands disgraced — found guilty of abusing her judicial power in a landlord-tenant dispute involving her own rental property.
According to the New Mexico Supreme Court’s findings, Griffin misused her official judicial login to create a fraudulent court document aimed at helping herself in an eviction lawsuit she filed against a tenant. Her egregious misuse of authority, the court ruled, undermined the integrity of the judiciary itself.
A Landlord-Judge Crosses the Line
At the center of this scandal lies an eviction lawsuit. Judge Griffin, acting as a landlord, fabricated a document under her own judicial credentials to strengthen her personal case. She then denied under oath that she had created the document, deflecting blame onto unsuspecting court clerks.
At a pretrial hearing for her lawsuit, a judge questioned Judge Griffin about the document’s creation. Despite her name on it, Griffin denied authorship and pointed blame at court clerks.
The Judicial Standards Commission determined that Judge Griffin produced a fraudulent document instead of a civil one not intended for an eviction case. Griffin, five months into her first term as a judge, claimed it was an error.
Chief Justice David K. Thomson stated, “Respondent further eroded the credibility of the judicial system by concealing the truth from another judge and officer of the court.”
The eviction case also involved Judge Griffin’s son, former Otero County Commissioner Couy Griffin, who was referenced in this case against Judge Griffin.
Can you imagine? A sitting judge, entrusted to uphold the law, instead chooses to weaponize her authority for personal gain — and then attempts to scapegoat innocent clerks to cover her tracks.
The Supreme Court’s Decision — A Slap on the Wrist?
Despite the severity of Griffin’s misconduct, the New Mexico Supreme Court ruled that she would not be removed from the bench. Instead, she received a 90-day unpaid suspension (excluding a previous suspension she served during the investigation), mandatory retraining on court systems, and an order to write apology letters to the clerks she falsely implicated.
She will also be assigned a “mentor” by the Court — an astonishing measure that raises serious questions about whether she ever should have been admitted to the bench in the first place.
Even more troubling, Griffin’s misconduct was brushed off with the excuse that she was “new” to her role — only five months into her first term. But as critics point out, if she is capable of such self-serving deception now, what might she attempt years down the line?
Calls for an Outside Investigation
Given the gravity of Judge Griffin’s offenses — including possible fraud, abuse of process, and potential perjury if she signed false documents under penalty of perjury — there are growing calls for an independent, external investigation into her conduct.
The judicial system cannot police itself when it so evidently fails to do so. Allowing Griffin to stay on the bench risks eroding public trust further, particularly at a time when judicial misconduct in New Mexico appears rampant.
Potential Claims by the Tenant
From a legal standpoint, the tenant targeted in Judge Griffin’s eviction action may have grounds to bring claims against her personally. If Griffin’s fraudulent court document caused material harm to the tenant — such as an unlawful eviction or damages — the tenant could potentially sue for:
