Avi Loeb’s latest observations reveal the object behaves nothing like anything from our solar system, with chemical signatures and jet patterns that challenge fundamental assumptions about where it came from.
[USA HERALD] – On November 16, 2025, the Keck Cosmic Web Imager mounted atop Hawaii’s Mauna Kea turned its gaze toward 3I/ATLAS, capturing the first detailed spectrum of the interstellar object after its closest approach to the Sun. What the instrument revealed has left Avi Loeb and his colleagues at Harvard grappling with data that defies comfortable categorization.
The object, located roughly 140 million miles from the Sun and 194 million miles from Earth at the time of observation, had just completed its swing through the inner solar system. Scientists had been watching it carefully since before its October 29 perihelion passage, noting oddities in its composition. The new observations confirmed their suspicions and added several more mysteries to the pile.
According to the spectroscopic data released by Loeb’s team, 3I/ATLAS exhibits an extraordinarily high ratio of nickel to iron in the gas cloud surrounding it. For context, comets from our solar system maintain relatively predictable metal ratios based on the composition of the primordial disk from which our Sun and planets formed. But 3I/ATLAS doesn’t follow that pattern. When the object was more than 230 million miles from the Sun, its nickel enrichment was off the charts compared to anything scientists have measured in local comets.
What makes this particularly strange is how the ratio changes. As 3I/ATLAS moved closer to the Sun, the nickel-to-iron ratio evolved in direct proportion to its distance, following a precise mathematical relationship. This isn’t random variation or measurement error. It’s a clear pattern that suggests something fundamental about either the object’s composition or the way it responds to solar heating differs from everything astronomers have studied before.
The chemical weirdness doesn’t stop with metals. The object is releasing cyanide gas, along with various carbon molecules including di-carbon and tri-carbon compounds. That’s not unusual in itself; comets often release these chemicals as they’re heated by the Sun. But the way these emissions respond to solar distance varies dramatically between different molecules, with cyanide showing the steepest decline as the object moves away from the Sun.
Then there’s the jet problem. When astronomers subtract the smooth, symmetrical glow around 3I/ATLAS’s nucleus, they can see distinct jets and tail features where gas and dust are being actively expelled. Standard comet behavior would suggest these jets should generally point away from the Sun, driven by solar heating vaporizing ices on the Sun-facing side.
3I/ATLAS didn’t get that memo. While the nickel, iron, cyanide, and di-carbon emissions all align roughly in the expected anti-solar direction, the tri-carbon emission shoots off at a completely different angle. It’s as if one particular molecule is playing by different rules, emerging from a separate vent or responding to forces the other materials aren’t experiencing.
This misalignment is more than just curious. It suggests either an unusually complex surface structure, with different volatile materials concentrated in different locations, or potentially different mechanisms driving the release of various compounds. Neither explanation fits neatly with current comet models.
The observations raise fundamental questions about 3I/ATLAS’s origin and composition. Objects from our solar system formed from the same swirling disk of gas and dust that gave birth to the Sun 4.6 billion years ago. They carry chemical signatures reflecting that shared heritage. Interstellar objects, by contrast, formed around different stars in different parts of the galaxy, potentially under vastly different conditions.
The extreme nickel enrichment could indicate 3I/ATLAS formed in a stellar environment with unusual metal abundances, perhaps near a star that had previously incorporated material from older stellar generations. The misaligned jets might reflect compositional heterogeneity that developed during its formation or through subsequent processing in interstellar space.
Loeb’s team notes that the upcoming Vera C. Rubin Observatory, a next-generation survey telescope currently under construction, should dramatically increase the detection rate of interstellar visitors. The facility is expected to spot many such objects before they reach their closest approach to the Sun, providing earlier warning and more observation time.
Having a larger sample size will prove crucial. Right now, astronomers are trying to understand how unusual 3I/ATLAS truly is based on a dataset of exactly three confirmed interstellar objects. That’s not enough to establish what “normal” looks like for visitors from beyond our solar system. Loeb’s team acknowledges this limitation directly, noting that additional discoveries will provide context for evaluating just how extraordinary this particular encounter is.
The object continues its outbound journey, heading toward Jupiter’s region of space. Additional observations are planned as it travels, potentially revealing whether the anomalies persist or evolve as 3I/ATLAS moves into the outer solar system’s colder environment.
What makes these findings particularly significant is their resistance to easy explanation. This isn’t a case where one anomaly can be explained away or where preliminary data might be revised with better instruments. Multiple independent measurements using one of Earth’s premier telescopes all point toward the same conclusion: 3I/ATLAS is genuinely strange.
The accumulating list of oddities suggests that our first detailed looks at interstellar visitors are revealing just how diverse planetary system formation can be across the galaxy. Every new data set challenges assumptions built on studying only the local neighborhood.
As 3I/ATLAS continues its trek through our solar system before returning to interstellar space, it carries with it a reminder of how much remains unknown about the universe beyond our Sun’s influence. The object arrived from somewhere with different chemistry, different formation conditions, and perhaps fundamentally different processes shaping its evolution. Understanding it may require expanding the very frameworks scientists use to categorize cosmic objects.
###
About the Author
Samuel Lopez is an investigative journalist for USA Herald, where he focuses on complex stories involving science, law, national security, and public accountability. With more than two decades of experience in legal and insurance analysis, Lopez is known for translating highly technical material—ranging from court filings to astrophysical data—into clear, accessible reporting without sacrificing rigor or precision.
In his ongoing coverage of interstellar object 3I/ATLAS, Lopez applies a forensic, evidence-driven approach more commonly found in courtroom analysis, carefully distinguishing verified data from speculation while examining why anomalies matter and what questions remain unanswered. His reporting emphasizes transparency, source accountability, and ethical journalism, with the goal of empowering readers to understand developments that may shape scientific, legal, and societal debates in the years ahead.
Join the USA Herald newsletter.
