• A tail that angles incorrectly
• A partial anti-tail structure
• A curvature that appears self-generated, not wind-shaped

Even accounting for perspective distortions, these orientations contradict standard comet behavior.

This echoes Loeb’s earlier findings: 3I/ATLAS underwent two sudden acceleration events that lacked sufficient mass loss to explain the force. In other words, it moved without being pushed.

Brightness Levels That Don’t Match a Natural Comet

Another anomaly is how bright the object appears this early.

At this distance from the Sun, natural interstellar objects:

• conserve volatiles
• brighten slowly
• display fragmentation indicators

3I/ATLAS does not.

The coma’s over-luminosity suggests:

• controlled heating
• a non-ice-based surface
• or internal energy generation

This is not normal behavior for any known comet—not even ‘Oumuamua.

No Dust Field, No Fragmentation, No Natural Decay

Under enhanced review, I observed:

❌ No micro-fragment train
❌ No particle fallout
❌ No dust plume scattering
❌ No debris fan

All are expected signs of a natural comet beginning to activate.

The absence of these features—alongside the presence of a strong, stable tail—simply adds to the paradox.

As one comet researcher quietly told me two weeks ago:
“It behaves like a thing that is emitting material, not losing it.”