The NCPA emphasized that while the laws and agreements do not directly impact the current case, they are catalysts for progress in compensating athletes. The group requested that the NLRB not rule until all parties respond to the withdrawal request.
The NCAA expressed support for setting a sustainable future for student-athletes, but noted that employment issues are a matter for Congress. USC agreed the case should be dismissed, asserting that the athletes should not be classified as employees.
The PAC-12 has opposed the withdrawal, citing a need for further consultation. The NCPA’s request is still pending a response from the NLRB.
Counsel Information
- NCPA is represented by executive director Ramogi Huma.
- NCAA is represented by Richard Pins, Naima Starks, Joseph Santucci, and Nicole Faulkner of Stinson LLP.
- USC is represented by Adam Abrahms, Neresa De Biasi, and Nicole Buffalano of Morgan Lewis & Bockius LLP.
- PAC-12 is represented by Daniel Nash, James Crowley, and Stacey Eisenstein of Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP.
Case Details
USC et al. and National Collegiate Players Association, case number 31-CA-290326, in the NLRB Division of Judges.
