- Gov. Code § 12955(a) – Discrimination based on source of income
- Gov. Code § 12955(c) – Discriminatory statements regarding source of income
- Gov. Code § 12955(k) – Denial or unavailability of housing based on income
- Civ. Code § 51 (Unruh Act) – Denial of full and equal accommodations in a business establishment
The lawsuit asserts that rejecting Jefferson’s voucher after she separated from her husband—and after she provided notice of her rights—constitutes a direct violation of California law amended under SB 329:
“[S]ource of income” includes “federal housing assistance vouchers issued under Section 8 of the United States Housing Act of 1937.” (Gov. Code § 12955(p))
Quotes that Expose Intent
- “We have decided NOT to participate in this program.” – Defendant Garrison’s handwritten note on Jefferson’s door (Complaint ¶ 24)
- “No need to send any more paperwork…” – Email rejecting voucher use (Complaint ¶ 21)
These communications go beyond policy—they could be viewed as evidence of intent to discriminate, forming the factual basis for punitive damages under both FEHA and the Unruh Act.
