DuPont argued that Schorr was not the ultimate decisionmaker in the firings. However, Judge Jackson highlighted that the evidence suggested Schorr’s input was significant. “Schorr led the investigation, collected evidence, and presented that evidence to the plant manager, recommending termination,” Judge Jackson said. “It is reasonable to infer from this information that termination would not have occurred but for Schorr’s efforts.”
DuPont Workers’ Age Bias Suit Headed to Trial : Dismissed Arguments
Aside from the age bias claim, Judge Jackson dismissed other arguments presented by St. Pierre and Wright. These included claims of ageist comments from a supervisor and instances where younger workers violated similar rules without being fired. Judge Jackson ruled that these arguments failed to demonstrate that the plant manager, who made the termination decisions, was aware of these incidents.
“This nexus is essential to showing pretext through disparate treatment, and its absence dooms plaintiffs’ argument,” Judge Jackson said.
Representation
St. Pierre and Wright are represented by J. Arthur Smith III, Joseph A. Smith IV of Smith Law Firm, and Michael J. Jefferson. DuPont is represented by Monique M. Weiner and Holly Y. Pailet of Kuchler Polk Weiner LLC.
