BAMP’s lawsuit against the city argued that the IZ-O was a form of unconstitutional property taking and violated state laws against undue business restrictions.
Legal Proceedings and Representation Shifts
Eckert Seamans navigated the lawsuit through significant legal hurdles, including opposing community groups’ attempts to intervene. However, financial disagreements led them to inform the federal court of BAMP’s unpaid bills, resulting in their withdrawal in June. Subsequently, BAMP has engaged Leech Tishman Fuscaldo & Lampl LLC for legal representation.
Despite partial payments and credits acknowledged by Eckert Seamans, including a substantial “courtesy discount,” the full settlement remains elusive.
Looking Ahead
As the case progresses, with Eckert Seamans represented by in-house counsel Timothy S. Coon and William A. Betts, the legal community watches closely. This lawsuit not only highlights challenges within legal-client relationships but also underscores the complex interplay between urban development and housing policy.
