GCL Sues Gwyneth Paltrow’s Goop Over Trademark Dispute**

55
SHARE

GCL further alleges that Goop’s products under the “Good. Clean. Goop” mark contain harsh chemicals, potentially misleading consumers into associating GCL’s products with harmful substances. Additionally, GCL claims that Goop’s use of terms like “naked” infringes on GCL’s trademark registrations.

Enter Email to View Articles

Loading...

The lawsuit underscores GCL’s concerns about Goop’s market dominance and its impact on GCL’s ability to diversify into other product lines. GCL argues that Goop’s actions not only confuse consumers but also hinder GCL’s growth prospects in the industry.

Despite GCL’s attempts to address the issue through a cease and desist letter, Goop allegedly intensified its marketing efforts using the disputed mark. GCL alleges that Goop’s actions exacerbate the confusion in the marketplace, potentially harming GCL’s brand reputation.

GCL’s lawsuit encompasses multiple claims, including federal trademark infringement, false advertising, and unfair competition, under both federal and Oregon law. Seeking both preliminary and permanent injunctions, GCL aims to halt Goop’s alleged infringement and secure damages, attorneys’ fees, and costs.