Globetrotters Bias Suit Moves Forward After Judge Rejects Dismissal Request

0
121
Globetrotters Bias Suit

A Georgia federal judge has recommended that the parent company of the Harlem Globetrotters and its media arm remain part of a lawsuit brought by former player Mianna Hopkins, who alleges she was cut from the team after rejecting the romantic advances of its general manager. U.S. Magistrate Judge Walter E. Johnson denied a motion by Herschend Entertainment Studios LLC (HES) and Herschend Family Entertainment Corp. (HFE) to dismiss the case, despite claims that they weren’t properly named in the initial discrimination charge.

Claims of Workplace Harassment and Retaliation

Hopkins, who performed with the Harlem Globetrotters from 2021 to 2023, alleged in her complaint that the general manager of the team harassed her by expressing romantic interest and inviting her to his hotel room. After she rejected his advances, the general manager allegedly told her she wouldn’t succeed without pursuing a relationship with him. In July 2023, her contract was not renewed, and she subsequently filed a Title VII discrimination suit.

Globetrotters Bias Suit : Parent Companies’ Dismissal Motion Denied

HES and HFE argued that Hopkins failed to name them in her charge with the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC), a procedural step required before filing an employment discrimination lawsuit. The companies contended that since they weren’t named, the claims against them should be dismissed. However, Judge Johnson ruled that the companies had sufficient notice of the charge because of their control over the Globetrotters and their shared registered agent with the basketball team.

Signup for the USA Herald exclusive Newsletter

Judge’s Reasoning on EEOC Charge Requirements

Judge Johnson noted that Title VII procedures are meant to facilitate justice, not hinder it, and that courts tend to liberally interpret the requirement to name all relevant entities in EEOC charges. He pointed out that while Hopkins could have named HES and HFE directly in her EEOC complaint, the companies were still adequately informed through shared corporate resources, including the registered agent who received a copy of the document.