Warnings Ignored, Misbranding Alleged
Haldiram’s said it notified Punjab in August 2024 that its conduct was unauthorized. The company did not respond.
After receiving a cease-and-desist letter in October, Punjab allegedly replied only to say it did not “intend to act as distributor” and was “not aware of import restrictions.”
Haldiram’s sued in August, asserting trademark infringement, false designation of origin, and unfair competition, arguing that Punjab’s conduct not only violated federal law but also risked confusing and misleading U.S. consumers.
Punjab Defaults as Judge Denies Delay
Punjab’s sole filing — a request for extra time to respond — was submitted Sept. 10, but Judge King denied the request. Nine days later, she granted Haldiram’s request for a default entry, paving the way for a potential judgment against Punjab.
Neither Punjab nor Haldiram’s counsel responded to requests for comment Thursday.
Legal Representation
Haldiram’s is represented by Jessica E. La Londe, Meghan C. Killian, and Jennifer Lantz of Duane Morris LLP.
Counsel for Punjab has not yet appeared in the case.
