Prosecutors also presented images of two machine guns Beard allegedly purchased with city funds, intending to mislead authorities by claiming they were for police use. Although these gun charges were dropped as part of his plea deal, the government argues that Beard should not receive credit for avoiding a nonviolent crime designation.
Beard’s Defense and Requests
Beard’s defense team, led by Scott R. Grubman and Serreen Meki of Chilivis Grubman, has argued that the sentencing report incorrectly categorizes some legitimate trips as fraudulent. Beard claims that trips to New Orleans and other locations were primarily for business purposes, with personal activities occurring only during off-hours. His attorneys assert that these trips involved substantial work on significant city projects and were essential to his role.
Beard, who acknowledged his wrongdoing, has requested a probationary sentence, contending that the illegal possession of firearms was not directly related to his embezzlement activities. His legal team argues that his conduct was an anomaly in an otherwise law-abiding career and that he should be judged on the broader context of his professional contributions.
Jim Beard Embezzlement Case: Awaiting Sentencing
As Beard’s sentencing approaches, the debate continues over the appropriate consequence for his actions. The case, which highlights issues of financial misconduct and public trust, remains under intense scrutiny as both sides prepare for the final judgment.
