The courtroom battle over J&J and Kenvue IPO Fraud Claims intensified this week after a federal judge refused to reconsider a prior decision allowing investors’ allegations to proceed. U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi ruled that Johnson & Johnson and its spinoff Kenvue Inc. failed to demonstrate any “clear error of law or fact” warranting dismissal of the securities fraud case tied to Kenvue’s 2023 initial public offering.
The pharmaceutical giant and its consumer health spinoff had urged the court to rethink its March ruling, arguing that the judge misapplied precedent, disregarded FDA labeling rules, and contradicted decisions in related multidistrict litigation and a 2015 Supreme Court case. But Judge Quraishi was unmoved, declaring that the companies’ arguments amounted to nothing more than disagreement with his prior findings.
Judge: “Disagreement Is Not a Basis for Reconsideration”
In his Tuesday opinion, Judge Quraishi said the court had correctly applied the Third Circuit’s materiality test to determine whether Johnson & Johnson and Kenvue’s alleged omissions were significant to investors. The companies’ failure to disclose key studies on phenylephrine — a common nasal decongestant — could have influenced reasonable investors’ decisions, the judge reaffirmed.
“The court found defendants’ statements were actionable because, in this case, they failed to disclose studies that concluded phenylephrine was not safe or effective,” Quraishi wrote. “Defendants were not required to reveal every study, but they were required to disclose at least some evidence that phenylephrine was not generally safe and effective.”
The judge added that the companies’ argument about conflicts with FDA regulations “missed the mark,” explaining that labeling phenylephrine as “effective” under FDA rules did not shield them from liability for allegedly concealing contradictory research.
