In contrast, U.S. Circuit Judge Raymond M. Kethledge dissented, asserting the Second Amendment inherently protects the right to train with firearms. “Restrictions on training can therefore hinder the right to bear arms,” Kethledge argued, emphasizing that firearm training is a practical necessity for effective use.
justices michigan gun range ban review : Claims of a Circuit Split
In their petition, Oakland Tactical and the residents contended that the Sixth Circuit ruling created a split among federal circuits. They pointed to decisions in the Third and Seventh circuits that struck down similar zoning ordinances restricting commercial gun ranges, suggesting inconsistent interpretations of Second Amendment rights.
The petition warned that the Sixth Circuit’s reasoning could have broader implications, potentially curtailing related rights such as firearm acquisition and storage. Oakland Tactical claimed the case presented an ideal opportunity for the Supreme Court to clarify Second Amendment protections.
Township Defense and Zoning Impact
Howell Township countered that no circuit split existed, arguing the Sixth Circuit’s ruling aligned with others permitting restrictions on firearm training at specific locations or for certain purposes. The township emphasized that the Second Amendment does not explicitly protect activities such as long-distance shooting training.
