Judge Aenlle-Rocha noted that Foster has not conceded ownership of the MB1 mark, contrary to the defendants’ claims. Instead, the court found that Foster has standing to bring the case, and jurisdiction over the claims was upheld.
Attempts to Strike Allegations Denied
In addition to their defense against the trademark claims, LaMelo Ball, his family, and Puma North America sought to strike certain allegations from Foster’s amended complaint. These included claims that LaMelo did not complete his high school education and relied on “fixers” to do it for him. The court denied this motion, stating that these allegations could be relevant to Foster’s breach-of-contract claim and the deterioration of his relationship with the Ball family.
LaMelo Ball trademark infringement Lawsuit: Legal Representation
Foster is represented by Raymond E. Brenneman, while LaMelo Ball and MB1 Enterprises are represented by attorneys from Pryor Cashman LLP. Puma North America is represented by Quarles & Brady LLP, and LaVar and Tina Ball have separate legal representation from The Cochran Firm California and McPherson LLP.
