The following day, a doctor she met with for only a few minutes allegedly wrote a progress note falsely claiming she was disheveled, paranoid, and had suicidal ideation, thus continuing her commitment.
On April 17, the fourth day of her confinement, the plaintiff, “through her own ingenuity and effort,” used a hospital worker’s phone to contact a public defender and secure a judge’s order to end her commitment. In a suspicious turn of events, a doctor then reported her suicidal ideation “suddenly disappeared” but allegedly falsified the time to make it appear the decision was made independently of the judge’s order.
At the heart of this case lies a grim indictment of a larger corporate structure. The hospital in question was acquired by Universal Health Services—a company notorious for its aggressive expansion and a history peppered with controversial settlements. In recent years, Universal Health Services has been under scrutiny for practices that many say prioritize revenue over real patient care. In 2020, for instance, the company settled a case for $122 million over allegations that it billed for unnecessary behavioral health services, among other claims. More recently, a Richmond jury awarded a staggering $360 million verdict against the company over related misconduct.
Drew LaFramboise, the plaintiff’s attorney, bluntly stated, “Behind this is a massive corporate enterprise that is continuing to expand rapidly and has made no bones about the fact that they are interested in nothing more than expansion and increasing occupancy in these facilities.” His words echo a growing chorus of criticism against profit-driven practices in healthcare—a trend that appears to leave vulnerable patients caught in the crossfire.
The city of Washington is not sitting idly by. Wayne Turnage, deputy mayor for health and human services, has revealed that in the past five months alone, the Department of Behavioral Health has reviewed 600 cases—nearly every involuntary admission at the hospital. “Washingtonians deserve the highest quality of care in our hospitals,” Turnage asserted. In response to these alarming findings, the District is poised to issue updated hospital regulations this summer, which promise to extend and tighten oversight of such facilities.
As regulatory bodies step in, questions remain about whether these measures will be sufficient to overhaul a system that, according to the lawsuit, deliberately sacrifices patient welfare for financial gain.
The lawsuit claims that the hospital and its corporate parent have violated multiple legal and ethical standards, including the Americans With Disabilities Act, the D.C. Human Rights Act, and even constitutional rights to privacy and due process.
Critics argue that UHS’s expansion strategy has created a scenario where patient care is sacrificed at the altar of revenue.
