In her motion, Ganieva contends that for a malicious prosecution claim to succeed, a plaintiff must pinpoint “specific and meaningful” damages arising from the allegedly malicious lawsuit. Generalized assertions of lost business, damage to reputation, and defense expenses are insufficient. The motion underscores the absence of evidence connecting the damage to Ganieva’s lawsuit.
The legal battle continues to evolve, promising further captivating developments as both sides fight to protect their interests.
