No Immunity Deal Despite Cooperation
Dispelling widespread media speculation, Maxwell’s attorney David Markus clarified that his client received no immunity agreement prior to or during her DOJ interviews. “There have been no asks and no promises,” Markus stated definitively following the sessions with Deputy AG Blanche. This clarification carries significant legal implications, as Maxwell’s statements could potentially be used in future prosecutions or civil proceedings.
The absence of an immunity deal raises questions about Maxwell’s motivations for cooperation. Markus acknowledged that “everybody knows Ms. Maxwell would welcome any relief,” but emphasized that the cooperation was not contingent on any quid pro quo arrangement. This approach differs markedly from typical high-profile federal cases, where cooperation agreements usually involve detailed proffer sessions and negotiated plea modifications.
Extensive Questioning Covers Broad Network
Deputy Attorney General Blanche’s questioning reportedly covered an extensive network of individuals connected to the Epstein operation, and Maxwell reportedly “answered every question.”
The scope of questioning—covering approximately 100 individuals—suggests federal investigators are pursuing a far broader inquiry than previously known. Legal analysts note that such extensive debriefing typically indicates prosecutors are building cases against multiple targets or seeking to understand the full operational structure of the trafficking network.
Blanche has committed to revealing information obtained from Maxwell “at the appropriate time,” language that suggests ongoing investigations may be nearing critical junctures. Federal prosecutors rarely conduct such high-profile interviews without specific investigative objectives already in motion.
