The Original Allegations
Farina filed suit in 2023, claiming that certain Mazda models suffered from a valve stem seal defect that allowed oil to leak into the combustion chamber — leading to engine damage and excessive oil consumption. He further alleged the vehicles were rigged to conceal emissions violations from drivers.
But in June, U.S. District Judge Max O. Cogburn Jr. dismissed the lawsuit, citing Farina’s failure to opt out of a California class settlement. That settlement — led by plaintiff Gary Guthrie — included free repairs, warranty extensions, and reimbursement for affected owners.
Undeterred, Farina moved to reopen the case, claiming Mazda had “gerrymandered” both the California and a separate Kentucky class settlement to silence his distinct legal claims.
Mazda Fires Back
Mazda accused Farina of misrepresenting court transcripts, especially in referencing the California case. The automaker said Farina is accusing its legal team of lying — all while ignoring the fact that he failed to properly exit the class settlement that would’ve barred further litigation.
Farina also cited Mazda financial statements referencing “provision related to environmental regulations” as proof of liability — an argument Mazda dismissed as “worn and tired.”
“Why Farina thinks his mischaracterizations support amending his claims is anyone’s guess,” Mazda stated. “Mazda already showed why he is wrong.”
