Under the Microscope
- OFAC’s Action: The U.S. Department of the Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) has investigated American Life Insurance Company (ALICO), a MetLife subsidiary, for apparent violations of Iranian sanctions.
- Settling the Score: ALICO’s $178,421 settlement acknowledges its responsibility for insuring entities tied to the Iranian government, underscoring the intricate interplay between international compliance and corporate liability.
- What It Means for Business: This case emphasizes the risks of inadequate compliance protocols in circumnavigating sanctions-heavy industries and regions.
By Samuel A. Lopez – USA Herald
[WASHINGTON, D.C.] 8:33 AM PST– In a striking development that has the legal and insurance sectors nervous, American Life Insurance Company (ALICO), a subsidiary of MetLife, Inc., has agreed to a settlement with The U.S. Department of the Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC), putting to rest allegations of over 2,300 violations of U.S. sanctions against Iran. The violations involved insurance policies provided to entities in the United Arab Emirates (UAE) connected to the Iranian government.
From early 2022 through mid-2023, ALICO engaged in activities that raised serious compliance flags. The violations stemmed from group medical and life insurance policies issued to UAE-based organizations tied to the Iranian government. While ALICO initially flagged some of these transactions, gaps in its compliance system allowed policies to be issued despite sanctions-related concerns.
For instance, one rejected policy application resurfaced under slightly altered circumstances, bypassing safeguards. A separate policy for a UAE-based school with “Iranian” in its name also evaded detection due to inconsistencies in the compliance checks.
These lapses led to the processing of 2,331 premiums and claims totaling $446,077—a clear breach of the Iranian Transactions and Sanctions Regulations (ITSR).
ALICO’s voluntary self-disclosure and the non-egregious nature of the violations led to a relatively modest settlement of $178,421. However, this figure doesn’t capture the reputational and operational costs of failing to adhere to international sanctions.
For businesses like MetLife’s subsidiaries, this case serves as a blunt reminder of the importance of robust compliance frameworks. As companies expand their global footprints, even minor lapses can invite regulatory scrutiny, fines, and potential damage to their standing in the market.
The involvement of a third-party administrator in the UAE adds another layer of complexity to this case. It raises questions about the due diligence responsibilities of companies when outsourcing administrative functions, especially in regions with close ties to sanctioned countries.
Implications for the Insurance Industry
This settlement sends a clear message to the insurance industry about the need for awareness in international operations. Companies must ensure that their compliance programs are not only comprehensive but also adaptable to the evolving landscape of international sanctions.
As we’ve seen in this case, even seemingly routine business transactions can have significant legal and financial consequences when they intersect with international sanctions regimes. The insurance industry, given its global reach, must be particularly nimble and attuned to these risks.
“The challenge for businesses is finding a way to grow while staying on top of regulations in today’s constantly changing global landscape.” – Samuel A. Lopez
Reporting by Samuel A. Lopez in California; Published by USA Herald
