Massachusetts law prohibits employers from asking about arrests or other legal issues that did not result in convictions. Employers are also barred from using such information to discriminate against applicants. According to Doe’s complaint, Morgan Stanley violated these rules during her application process.
Morgan Stanley Applicant Lawsuit: Background of the Case
Doe had applied for a senior registered service associate position in March 2022. Although Morgan Stanley initially offered her the role in May, it later demanded details of her arrest history, as well as police reports and court documents. The lawsuit claims these requests crossed the legal line and that the bank’s actions disproportionately impacted communities of color, who face higher arrest rates than white individuals, as noted by the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission.
Ultimately, Morgan Stanley rescinded the job offer in August 2022, citing the background check findings. This move sparked Doe’s lawsuit, now shaping up as a potential class action.
Morgan Stanley Applicant Lawsuit: Legal Teams in Action
Jane Doe is represented by Stephen S. Churchill of Fair Work PC, while Morgan Stanley is defended by Justin F. Keith of Greenberg Traurig LLP. Both sides have yet to comment on the latest development.
