Defense and Counterclaims
Josh Durham, representing Spencer, argued that his client promptly removed the video upon the contempt motion, emphasizing its original intent to promote the museum. Durham suggested that ITG’s actions, including alleged false accusations and privacy breaches, provoked Spencer’s statements.
Impending Decision
The court deliberated on potential remedies, with ITG advocating for a formal retraction, while Spencer’s counsel contended that removal of the video sufficed. Judge Conrad expressed concern over the parties’ return to court, urging reconciliation and voluntary resolution.
Looking Ahead
As the legal showdown between ITG and Spencer continues, tensions remain high, with both sides adamant in their positions. The case, ITG Brands LLC v. Spencer, promises further courtroom drama as it unfolds in the North Carolina Business Court.
