The plaintiffs’ legal eagles fervently countered, detailing their unyielding push for a pro-rata approach during negotiations. Their stance? “Given a fork in the road between compromise and abandonment, compromise was the strategic choice. It was neither unreasonable nor unjust.”
The curtain remains down on comments from the plaintiffs’ attorneys, and the U.S. Department of Justice remains silent on the matter.
Legal Luminaries of the Case
Championing the class are legal mavens Deepak Gupta and Jonathan E. Taylor from Gupta Wessler LLP, joined by William H. Narwold, Meghan S.B. Oliver, and Charlotte E. Loper of Motley Rice LLC.
On the flip side, Brenda González Horowitz from the DOJ’s Civil Division is the government’s legal torchbearer.
