“The plaintiffs have acknowledged their choice to file in Pennsylvania was to secure a better recovery than they might have in their home forum,” Sikorsky’s legal team stated. They also emphasize that the crash involved Canadian Air Force members and took place in Greece, so there’s little connection to the state of Pennsylvania. The company maintains that the legal case should rightfully be heard in Connecticut, where Sikorsky’s operations are based.
A Delay or a Necessary Legal Move?
Critics of Sikorsky’s actions claim the move to transfer the case is simply a stalling tactic, aimed at delaying the legal proceedings. Sikorsky counters that filing the motion to transfer after a prior motion to dismiss was denied was entirely appropriate. They argue that it would have been illogical to submit both motions at the same time.
Moreover, Sikorsky points out that the prior motion, which sought to dismiss the case on grounds of improper forum, was based on the assertion that the case should have been heard in Canada. Since the court denied that motion, Sikorsky argues that moving the venue to Connecticut is the next logical step.
Motion for Reconsideration on Discovery Ruling
The company’s legal team did not stop there. On the same day, Sikorsky filed a motion for reconsideration of the court’s order compelling the company to respond to certain discovery requests before the deadline. Sikorsky claims that the families did not meet in good faith to resolve their discovery disputes and is asking the court to stay all discovery issues until the motion to transfer is settled.
What’s Next in the Sikorsky Lawsuit?
As the case continues to unfold, both sides are gearing up for a lengthy legal battle. Sikorsky’s motion to transfer the case to Connecticut is just one chapter in a complex and emotionally charged dispute. With lives lost and high stakes on both sides, the outcome remains uncertain.