Judge Shelby found the allegations sufficient to proceed, rejecting Sundance’s assertion that the plaintiffs failed to adequately claim that their personal information was disclosed unlawfully.
“The first amended complaint allows the court to draw the reasonable inference that the defendant is liable for the misconduct alleged,” the judge wrote.
Broader Implications for Class Actions
The decision could have significant implications for similar consumer protection lawsuits, particularly in states with laws restricting class actions. Judge Shelby acknowledged that class actions may increase litigation costs and risks for defendants but emphasized that procedural rules like Rule 23 are not intended to alter substantive rights.
The ruling ensures the plaintiffs can pursue their claims collectively, potentially increasing financial exposure for Sundance.
Sundance Data Disclosures Suit : Legal Representation
The plaintiffs are represented by Frank S. Hedin and Elliot O. Jackson of Hedin LLP, along with David W. Scofield of Peters Scofield. Sundance is represented by Elizabeth C. Rinehart of Venable LLP and Jordan K. Cameron of Cameron Ringwood LC. Neither party has commented on the ruling.
