Volvo, in its response, argued that Arroyo never claimed the company failed to reemploy her. Instead, her allegations focused solely on her termination in November 2011. The company maintained that Arroyo continued in her role as a material handler after returning from her military duties until her termination over a year later due to attendance issues.
Volvo Worker’s Military Bias Suit : Legal Representation
Arroyo was represented by John N. Maher of Maher Legal Services PC. Volvo was represented by William J. McMahon IV of Constangy Brooks Smith & Prophete LLP. Both parties did not immediately respond to requests for comment on the Supreme Court’s decision.
