The intervenors, including the MHA Nation and two members, are represented by the Native American Rights Fund, the Campaign Legal Center, and attorney Bryan L. Sells. The nation contends that the North Dakota Legislature’s redistricting did not prioritize race over traditional criteria and that the new subdistricts comply with the VRA.
North Dakota Voting Dispute : Conclusion
As the Supreme Court awaits the Solicitor General’s brief, the outcome of the North Dakota voting dispute remains uncertain. The high court’s decision could have significant implications for how states address racial considerations in redistricting while complying with federal voting rights laws.
