By SAMUEL LOPEZ
USA HERALD (August 26, 2025)
President Donald Trump on Monday evening fired Federal Reserve Gov. Lisa Cook over his administration’s allegation that she committed mortgage fraud, thrusting the White House into uncharted territory in its campaign to exert control over the central bank.
Key Developments
- Trump becomes first president in Fed’s 111-year history to fire a sitting governor
- Cook refuses to resign, setting up potential physical confrontation at Federal Reserve building
- Legal showdown brewing over presidential authority versus Fed independence
WASHINGTON, DC – Trump’s move to dismiss Cook, a Biden appointee, comes after Federal Housing Finance Agency Director Bill Pulte accused her earlier this month of submitting false information on mortgage paperwork from 2021, before she joined the Fed’s Board of Governors.
Trump announced Cook’s termination in a Truth Social media post, saying he had “determined that there is sufficient cause to remove” her from the position. He had previously called for Cook to resign, a demand he escalated on Friday by threatening to fire her if she did not resign voluntarily.
“The Federal Reserve has tremendous responsibility for setting interest rates and regulating reserve and member banks,” Trump said in a letter addressed to Cook and shared on his social media. “The American people must be able to have full confidence in the honesty of the members entrusted with setting policy and overseeing the Federal Reserve.”
“In light of your deceitful and potentially criminal conduct in a financial matter, they cannot and I do not have such confidence in your integrity,” he added.
In a statement late Monday, Cook responded with defiance: “President Trump purported to fire me ‘for cause’ when no cause exists under the law, and he has no authority to do so. I will not resign. I will continue to carry out my duties to help the American economy as I have been doing since 2022.”
Her lawyer, Abbe David Lowell of Lowell & Associates, said: “President Trump has taken to social media to once again ‘fire by tweet’ and once again his reflex to bully is flawed and his demands lack any proper process, basis or legal authority. We will take whatever actions are needed to prevent his attempted illegal action.”
Cook’s refusal to acknowledge Trump’s authority sets up an unprecedented confrontation that could play out at the Federal Reserve’s headquarters on Constitution Avenue. If Cook attempts to report for work this week, she could potentially face physical removal from the building and a trespass notice, sources familiar with the situation tell USA Herald.
The president’s authority to remove Fed governors rests on a complex web of statutory interpretation that has never been tested in court. The Federal Reserve Act states that board members can only be removed “for cause,” which legal scholars have traditionally interpreted as requiring serious misconduct, criminal conviction, or incapacity to perform duties.
Cook’s potential defense strategy would likely center on challenging both the sufficiency of the evidence and the procedural requirements for removal. Her legal team could argue that unproven allegations, without formal criminal charges or due process proceedings, cannot constitute the “cause” required under federal law. However, this would be an uphill battle for Cook, given the amount of evidence the administration has in support of its allegation of mortgage fraud.
The mortgage fraud allegations stem from Cook’s 2021 financial dealings, before she joined the Fed. Pulte alleges, she falsely declared two different properties as her primary residence to obtain favorable loan terms – a practice known as occupancy fraud that can result in better interest rates. While no formal criminal investigation has been announced by the Department of Justice, Pulte has made a criminal referral.
From an evidentiary standpoint, mortgage fraud cases are typically document-intensive prosecutions that rely heavily on loan applications, insurance policies, bank statements, and sworn affidavits rather than defendant cooperation. Cook’s willingness to “take questions about her financial history” may be legally irrelevant, as federal prosecutors can build a solid case based solely on paper trails and financial records without requiring the alleged perpetrator’s cooperation or explanations.
The moral turpitude implications of alleged mortgage fraud create additional complications for Cook’s position. Even if the alleged conduct occurred before her Federal Reserve appointment, questions about ethical fitness and candor during the confirmation process could provide Trump with stronger legal grounds for a “for cause” removal.
If Cook continues to resist Trump’s directive, her situation could deteriorate rapidly. Federal investigators could intensify scrutiny of her financial records, potentially uncovering additional irregularities. The Department of Justice could expedite any criminal investigation, and Cook could face congressional subpoenas demanding testimony about her mortgage applications and disclosure obligations during her confirmation process.
No president has ever fired a sitting Fed governor of the board, and Trump’s attempt to do so will almost certainly be challenged in federal court. By federal law, members of the Fed’s board can only be removed “for cause,” which has generally meant something like serious misconduct or incapacity. This protection forms the legal foundation of the Fed’s longstanding independence from the White House, providing assurance that central bank leaders will have discretion to fight inflation and pursue full employment without fear of retribution.
To date, there have been no formal charges brought against Cook, and the fraud claims remain unadjudicated. After Pulte first publicly aired his allegations on Aug. 20, Cook issued a statement saying that she had “no intention of being bullied to step down.”
“I do intend to take any questions about my financial history seriously as a member of the Federal Reserve and so I am gathering the accurate information to answer any legitimate questions and provide the facts,” she said at the time.
Presidential Removal Authority
The Federal Reserve Act of 1913 grants the president authority to remove board members, but only “for cause.”Unlike cabinet positions that serve at presidential pleasure, Fed governors enjoy statutory protection designed to insulate monetary policy from political interference.
Legal precedent for “cause” removal typically requires: (1) criminal conviction, (2) documented misconduct in official capacity, (3) mental or physical incapacity, or (4) violation of federal ethics rules. The burden of proof generally requires clear and convincing evidence.
Trump’s legal theory appears to rest on the argument that mortgage fraud constitutes sufficient cause when combined with potential ethics violations during the confirmation process.
🛑 It should be noted that the mortgage fraud allegations against Gov. Cook are merely allegations and have not been proven in a court of law.
