Why Cardi B Could Become a Key Witness
Cardi B’s rally appearance in West Allis, Wisconsin, went viral for a teleprompter flop that forced her to summon assistant Precious and read an endorsement off her phone. Conservatives claimed she “cashed a check”; Cardi fired back that she paid her own airfare. theJasmineBRANDZ100 New York
If a grand jury forms, investigators will want:
- Invoices & W‑9s for any Cardi B campaign payments.
- Communications with campaign staff about “talking points” or compensation.
- Bank‑statement trace to confirm or refute self‑funded travel.
A truthful witness can clear her name. A false statement could invite 18 U.S.C. §1001 charges. Any unrelated tax issues or pending civil suits could become leverage, illustrating Trump’s warning that an FBI probe “peels back layers behind the celebrity glamour.”
Could Trump’s Legal Theory Stick?
Strengths
- Optics of Overpayment. Multi‑million‑dollar invoices for five‑minute speeches look suspicious and may exceed “usual and normal charge,” satisfying a core element of 11 C.F.R. §100.52(d).
- Foreign‑National Angle. Bono’s involvement could trigger a bright‑line FECA violation.
- Sharpton’s Quid Pro Quo Risk. A nonprofit receiving campaign funds, then providing favorable media coverage, parallels past “pay‑to‑play” enforcement actions.
Weaknesses
- Proof of Intent. Prosecutors must show Harris’s team intended to purchase endorsements, not just performances.
- First‑Amendment Cushion. Paying an artist for a show that incidentally includes political speech implicates free‑speech protections; regulators tread lightly.
Bottom line: Trump’s allegation is not open‑and‑shut. The case hinges on whether payments were inflated, mischaracterized, or laundered through third‑party entities.
