However, the dark cloud of the statute of limitations looms, with Trump’s attorneys invoking it frequently, posing a potential thorn in the pursuit of claims stemming from conduct prior to June 13, 2014.
As Wallace probes Bender about a particular 2015 letter from Weisselberg, sharp and critical questions hover: Would Mazars have endorsed the 2015 financial conditions if any representations were false? The answer, a firm “No,” echoes through the courtroom, cementing a critical standpoint in this tumultuous trial.
The Trial Continues: Conspiracy, False Records, and More
In a room on the third floor of New York Supreme Court, heavily guarded and shrouded in anticipation, Trump, surrounded by his legal team, navigates through a storm of allegations brought forth by James’ office. With accusations of a decade-long scheme to artificially and drastically inflate his net worth, thereby enticing banks and insurers into favorable dealings, the trial not only seeks to unveil the truth behind these assertions but also to judge causes of action including insurance fraud and conspiracy.
