Krisak, attempting to clear the mist around him, claimed he was navigating via a map and vocal guidelines when the collision occurred while shifting lanes. Piecing together these fragments, the panel deduced enough evidence to back the jury’s verdict.
Was Avoidance Possible? The Great Debate
Werner brandished the doctrine of avoidable consequences, hoping to shield themselves. Yet, the panel pierced through their defense, asserting that Werner failed to illustrate how Handley, despite her fleeting distraction, could have steered clear of the catastrophe.
ACE’s Shadowy Presence: A Twist in the Tale
The erroneous mention of ACE on the jury form? A mere specter in the case title, the panel clarified. With jurors adhering to explicit oral instructions, the mere mention of ACE was swiftly rectified. In a swift turn of events, within minutes, the jury confirmed the verdict was solely Werner’s cross to bear.
Werner Enterprises $3.6M Verdict : Voices From the Frontline
Savoring victory, Zachary R. Sprouse, championing Handley’s cause, expressed gratitude, highlighting the undeniable strength of their case and Handley’s resilience amidst the traumatic incident. The silence from Werner’s camp, however, remains deafening.
