The Genesis of Legal Conflict
The dispute traces back to a 2007 contract that Tompkins signed with G-Unit Books, transferring what the document characterizes as “unconditional, irrevocable, exclusive and perpetual” rights to her life story. This sweeping agreement effectively placed her personal experiences, including her relationship with 50 Cent and their son Marquise, under the publishing company’s exclusive domain.
According to court filings obtained by USA Herald, the arrangement was designed to prevent exactly the type of public commentary and monetization that G-Unit Books now alleges Tompkins has undertaken. The rapper, whose legal name is Curtis Jackson, reportedly structured the deal both for potential future biographical projects and as a protective measure against unauthorized exploitation of their shared history.
Allegations and Breach Claims
G-Unit Books contends that Tompkins systematically violated the agreement by posting and promoting a series of interviews and videos detailing her past relationship with 50 Cent. The content allegedly includes serious accusations against the rapper, including claims of physical abuse during her pregnancy with their son in 1996, ongoing verbal and physical abuse throughout their relationship, and specific incidents of violence.
“Capitalizing on her recent notoriety from a ‘viral’ post commenting on testimony in the high-profile ‘Diddy’ trial, Tompkins has repeatedly and deliberately exploited the very rights she conveyed to G-Unit Books,” states the complaint filed in federal court.
The legal team representing G-Unit Books, led by attorney Reena Jain, argues that Tompkins’ actions demonstrate clear intentionality. “Tompkins’ behavior was intentional—she explicitly referenced the very agreement she breached while she actively breached it, stating it was something that was ‘going to have to be worked out legally,'” Jain noted in court documents.
