https://www.lumendatabase.org/notices/13996733 (another “pro se” defendant that agreed to the stipulation).
https://www.lumendatabase.org/notices/14188811 (claims that 9 defendants were properly served to remove negative information from Google but none of them decided to answer).
https://www.lumendatabase.org/file_uploads/files/4255692/004/255/692/original/Default%20Judgment%20–%20SIGNED-stuart%20millheiser.pdf?1491603470 (one the links here is from a well known publisher in the reputation management industry: http://badforpeople.org/tag/stuart-millheiser-reviews/. Apparently the alleged poster here was served legally too but decided not to answer, resulting in another default order….)
https://www.lumendatabase.org/notices/14115366 (Yet another case where the defendants were allegedly served but didn’t respond, resulting in a default….)
https://www.lumendatabase.org/notices/14189032
More details to come around this filing and more filings.
To read previous Kelly Warner Law Firm articles that we’ve covered visit this link: https://usaherald.com/?s=kelly+warner
