Where the case stands
The discovery phase is active. A judge has already permitted Drake to seek core categories of documents—including Lamar’s recording agreements—over UMG’s objection that discovery was premature. That win keeps Drake’s evidence-gathering on track while the court weighs UMG’s motion to dismiss.
In a separate discovery skirmish, the court approved alternative service to reach a witness Drake claims has knowledge of alleged “covert tactics” used to promote the track; the order recounts attempts to serve the witness and allows service by mail and email. UMG denies any botting or related schemes.
Meanwhile, Drake’s amended pleading ties reputational harm to highly watched moments—the Super Bowl LIX halftime show and the Grammys—contending those broadcasts amplified the “pedophile” insinuations and increased threats, while noting the Super Bowl performance omitted the word “pedophile.” UMG disputes those theories and says context and artistic license control.
What to watch next
- Grainge custodial files:The court will decide whether UMG must search the CEO’s email and documents using negotiated terms. That ruling will help determine how far “apex” protections stretch here and whether Drake can test his “actual malice” theory at the top of UMG.
- Motion to dismiss:If the judge credits UMG’s arguments that the lyrics and promotion are protected expression or opinion, claims could be pared back or tossed; otherwise, more depositions and document fights lie ahead.
- Discovery scope:With discovery underway, both sides will press for sensitive materials; Note – the judge already rejected a request to halt discovery at an earlier stage.
🛑 It should be noted that the assertions in Drake’s lawsuit are merely allegations and have not been proven in a court of law.
