The U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) has taken a significant stand by filing a lawsuit in a Georgia federal court. The case centers around John Nizer, a Black manager who was subjected to discriminatory treatment by his employer, Sureste Property Group LLC. Nizer, who was tasked with a workload more than double that of his white counterpart, was paid less and eventually dismissed under the pretext of laziness, the EEOC claims.
EEOC Challenges Race-Based Employment Decisions
On Wednesday, the EEOC pressed forward with its Title VII complaint against Sureste Property Group and its associated divisions. Despite Nizer’s superior performance and dedication, his employment was abruptly terminated in June 2022, barely six months into his role. This act of dismissal not only highlights alleged racial biases but also contravenes federal laws that prohibit employment decisions based on race. “Federal law prohibits employers from making employment decisions based on race,” stated Marcus G. Keegan, regional attorney for the EEOC’s Atlanta district office.
EEOC Black Worker lawsuit: Discrepancies in Treatment and Compensation
Sureste Property Group’s decision to hire Nizer as a project development manager marked him as the first Black individual to occupy this position within the company. Despite his extensive qualifications, including a master of business administration and over thirteen years of industry experience, Nizer was not only burdened with an excessive workload compared to his white female colleague but also received a lower salary. This disparity extended beyond responsibilities, as Nizer often had to work late or on weekends, a requirement not imposed on his colleague.
EEOC Black Worker lawsuit: EEOC’s Demands and Legal Proceedings
The lawsuit seeks decisive actions against Sureste Property Group, urging the company to amend its internal policies regarding equal employment opportunities and to cease any form of racial discrimination. Furthermore, the EEOC is advocating for Nizer to receive back pay, front pay, and punitive damages as compensation for the discriminatory practices he endured.
