The Foundation of a Groundbreaking Case
The lawsuit emerged from Flores’ abrupt firing from the Miami Dolphins in January 2022, despite leading the team to consecutive winning seasons. One month later, Flores filed a bombshell lawsuit that sent shockwaves through the NFL establishment, alleging the league was “rife with racism, particularly when it comes to the hiring and retention of Black head coaches, coordinators and general managers.”
The case gained additional momentum when other prominent coaches joined as plaintiffs, including Steve Wilks, currently serving as defensive coordinator for the New York Jets, and Ray Horton, a former defensive coordinator for multiple NFL clubs. Their collective voice transformed an individual grievance into a systemic challenge against alleged discriminatory practices across the league.
Court Exposes Fundamental Flaws in NFL’s Arbitration Strategy
Circuit Judge Jose A. Cabranes delivered the court’s opinion with surgical precision, identifying critical deficiencies in the NFL’s arbitration framework. The judge determined that having Commissioner Roger Goodell serve as arbitrator would be “unenforceable because the agreement fails to guarantee that Flores can ‘vindicate (his) statutory cause of action in (an) arbitral forum.'”
This ruling exposes a fundamental contradiction in the NFL’s position: the league cannot simultaneously defend against discrimination allegations while positioning the very commissioner overseeing the allegedly discriminatory system as the neutral arbitrator. Judge Cabranes recognized this inherent conflict undermines the basic principles of fair adjudication.
The appellate court upheld District Judge Valerie Caproni’s March 2023 ruling, which had already determined that claims against the Giants, Broncos, and Texans would remain in federal court. Judge Caproni had also ruled that “related claims” against the NFL itself could proceed in court rather than arbitration.
