“The government is finally doing what it should have all along: sharing information across the federal government to solve problems,” the DHS said.
To its critics, however, the language is chilling—a rhetorical fog concealing a deeper erosion of rights and safeguards.
Who’s Fighting and Who’s Defending
Representing the plaintiffs are heavyweights in public interest litigation:
-
Nandan M. Joshi and Michael T. Kirkpatrick of Public Citizen Litigation Group
-
Kevin L. Herrera and Mark H. Birhanu of Raise the Floor Alliance
-
Alan B. Morrison of George Washington University Law School
The U.S. government is represented by Joseph A. Sergi and Andrew J. Weisberg of the Department of Justice. The DOJ, while defending the agreement vigorously in filings, has declined public comment.
What’s at Stake
Though no records have yet been exchanged, the lawsuit may set a precedent with wide-reaching implications. If the court upholds the IRS-ICE pact, it could embolden further inter-agency data exchanges and redefine the limits of taxpayer privacy—not just for immigrants, but for every American.
As the legal battle unfolds, one thing is clear: the IRS ICE Taxpayers Agreement has ignited a fierce debate that cuts to the core of privacy, due process, and the future of federal data power.
