What’s Important:
- Legal Rights Matter:When servicemembers deploy, they rely on protections like the Servicemembers Civil Relief Act (SCRA) to safeguard their financial and property interests. Violations impact not only them but set precedents affecting all active-duty personnel.
- Protecting Those Who Serve:California is taking a stand by enforcing laws that honor and respect military personnel. This case serves as a powerful reminder for companies to prioritize compliance with federal protections.
- Accountability in Action:The Justice Department’s lawsuit sends a clear message that violations against servicemembers’ rights will not go unchecked, emphasizing the serious legal consequences for businesses that fall short
By Samuel A. Lopez, USA Herald
[CALIFORNIA] – When servicemembers deploy, they leave their daily lives behind and trust that the law will protect their property. But what happens when those protections are ignored? Recently, a shocking case emerged, highlighting the vulnerability of even our most valued military personnel.
In August 2024, the Justice Department sued Tony’s Auto Center Inc., a towing company in Chula Vista, California, for allegedly auctioning a U.S. Navy lieutenant’s vehicle in violation of the federal Servicemembers Civil Relief Act (SCRA). This law, created to protect those on active duty, requires companies to obtain a court order before auctioning a deployed servicemember’s property. In this case, that didn’t happen, leading to serious financial repercussions for the Lieutenant.
The lawsuit, filed in the Southern District of California, claims that while the Lieutenant was serving at sea, Tony’s Auto Center auctioned his 2011 Mazda 6, which he had left parked with personal belongings in front of a friend’s house. After it was impounded for expired registration, the car ended up at Tony’s Auto Center, where it was later sold at auction without the required court permission.
Returning from deployment, the Lieutenant learned his vehicle was gone—yet he was still financially responsible for it, including a significant remaining balance. “Servicemembers commit to protecting our nation,” I pondered while reviewing the lawsuit, “and the law needs to uphold that commitment by safeguarding their rights while they’re away.”
