A storm is brewing in the automotive world as a proposed class of car buyers launches a legal assault against Nissan North America Inc. Allegations swirl around the claim that the automotive giant knowingly unleashed defective radiator fans into the market, specifically affecting Pathfinder and Infiniti vehicles. The repercussions? Engines overheating and abrupt shutdowns that could put lives at risk.
Nissan Cooling Fans Defective Lawsuit : Allegations Unveiled
In a legal blitz filed in Tennessee federal court, spearheaded by Lauren Anderson, the proposed class asserts that Nissan had full knowledge of this defect dating back to 2013. How? Through a combination of product testing and a deluge of consumer complaints that flooded in over the years.
The Target: Model Years 2013-2017
The lawsuit locks its aim on Nissan’s models ranging from 2013 to 2017, including the Pathfinder and the 2014-2017 Infiniti QX60 vehicles. According to the complaint, the warning signs of trouble manifest as an ominous symphony of “loud squealing, rattling, or clacking sounds” emanating from the engine, signaling an impending breakdown of the fan.
Nissan Cooling Fans Defective Lawsuit : A Costly Conundrum
The fallout for consumers? Unsafe and unreliable vehicles on the roads, with potential repair costs soaring sky-high, sometimes eclipsing the $1,000 mark. But here’s the kicker – the repairs are akin to a game of whack-a-mole, with Nissan allegedly swapping one faulty part for another, leaving consumers stranded in a vicious cycle of automotive agony.
Early Warnings Ignored
Anderson alleges that Nissan’s own monitoring systems, coupled with recorded in-warranty repair data, should have raised red flags early on. Public statements from the company’s senior manager hint at a systematic oversight, where issues are investigated only if they breach a “0.5 incident rate.” However, the reality, as per the complaint, paints a graver picture with the fan defect happening at a significantly higher frequency.
Technical Bulletins and Tardy Remediation
Adding fuel to the legal fire, a 2017 technical service bulletin surfaces, indicating Nissan’s awareness of the defect. The bulletin outlines procedures for dealerships to replace faulty cooling fans, a tacit acknowledgment of the issue. However, Anderson argues that the tardy response, coupled with the absence of a recall, left consumers in the dark, exacerbating their plight.
Nissan Cooling Fans Defective Lawsuit : Seeking Redemption
The plaintiffs aren’t just seeking a legal slap on the wrist. They’re aiming for redemption, demanding coverage for future repairs, not merely compensation for past grievances. With claims stretching across a nationwide spectrum and specific classes in Maryland, Massachusetts, Ohio, and Pennsylvania, the legal battleground is set.
Silence from the Titan
While the legal tempest brews, Nissan remains tight-lipped, declining to comment on the matter. Attempts to reach representatives for the proposed class were met with silence, underscoring the gravity of the situation.
Nissan Cooling Fans Defective Lawsuit : Legal Eagles Take Flight
In this high-stakes legal drama, the proposed class finds representation in the formidable duo of J. Gerard Stranch IV, Michael C. Iadevaia from Stranch Jennings & Garvey PLLC, and Mark Greenstone, Benjamin Donahue from Greenstone Law APC. As for Nissan, the counsel’s details remain shrouded in mystery, adding another layer of intrigue to this unfolding saga.
