NY Law Firm Can’t Ditch SEC Ponzi Scheme Suit

213
SHARE
NY Law Firm Cant Ditch SEC Ponzi Scheme Suit
The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission headquarters stands in Washington, D.C., U.S., on Thursday, Jan. 2, 2020. The federal appeals court in Manhattan today said the government may pursue insider-trading charges under a newer securities-fraud law not subject to a key requirement of the statute prosecutors traditionally use. Photographer: Andrew Harrer/Bloomberg

In a dramatic twist akin to a thriller, a New York law firm finds itself ensnared in a complex legal battle with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). Frost & Miller LLP, accused of aiding an alleged $8.4 million Ponzi scheme, cannot shake off the charges as U.S. District Judge Sam A. Lindsay delivers a firm verdict.

Enter Email to View Articles

Loading...

NY Law Firm Can’t Ditch SEC Ponzi Scheme Suit : The Tangled Web of Accusations

The firm’s attempt to extricate itself, likened to a chess player’s strategic move, was overturned. Magistrate Judge Renee Harris Toliver’s report last month likened the firm’s dismissal bid to a house built on sand. Frost & Miller’s argument, that they were oblivious to the fraud, was met with skepticism. The SEC contends that their failure was not in their ignorance, but in their lack of vigilance.

NY Law Firm Can’t Ditch SEC Ponzi Scheme Suit :  A Glimpse into the Maelstrom

The saga began when the firm, represented by Kenneth Miller and Gregory Frost, was implicated alongside Aaron Cain McKnight, a Dallas man accused of a fraudulent promise of sky-high returns to investors. While not directly accused of participating in the scheme, Frost & Miller is alleged to have turned a blind eye to McKnight’s suspicious activities.

Ignoring the Warning Signs

The firm’s bank accounts were allegedly used for McKnight’s transactions, despite several red flags waving high. These included McKnight’s criminal past and a substantial amount of unpaid legal bills, juxtaposed against large sums moving through the firm’s accounts.

The Legal Counterstrike and Its Repudiation

In a bold move, Frost & Miller sought to dismiss the SEC’s allegations, branding them as speculative. However, the SEC and Judge Toliver asserted that the firm’s ignorance does not absolve it of liability. The Dodd-Frank Act’s standards, which prioritize recklessness, were cited as the firm’s undoing.

NY Law Firm Can’t Ditch SEC Ponzi Scheme Suit : The Ongoing Legal Maelstrom

The SEC has maintained a stoic silence regarding the unfolding drama. Frost & Miller’s representatives have yet to comment on this latest development. Representing the SEC are Anna Odella Area, Jennifer D. Reece, and David B. Reece, while Frost & Miller’s defense is in the hands of Jeffrey J. Ansley, Samuel M. Deau, and Joshua D. Nichols of Vedder Price PC.