Patent Biz Drops WDTX Case Against Apple

203
SHARE
Patent Biz Drops WDTX Case Against Apple
An Apple logo hangs above the entrance to the Apple store on 5th Avenue in the Manhattan borough of New York City, July 21, 2015. REUTERS/Mike Segar

In a strategic retreat reminiscent of a grandmaster’s prudent move in chess, Arigna Technology Ltd., a prominent patent licensing firm, has withdrawn its patent lawsuit against tech titan Apple in the Western District of Texas. This move comes roughly 18 months after Arigna settled a similar dispute with Samsung, signaling a potential pattern in their litigation strategy.

A Mysterious Finale to a Prolonged Legal Saga

Tuesday witnessed a concise, yet impactful, filing from both Arigna and Apple, signaling the cessation of a legal skirmish that has stretched over two years in the federal court of Waco, Texas. The details of the filing are shrouded in mystery, with no clear indication of a settlement and silence from both parties’ counsel.

Patent Biz Drops WDTX Case Against Apple: Innovation or Infringement?

At the crux of this legal thriller lies Arigna’s claim that Apple’s iPhone 12 infringed upon patents dating back to 2002. These patents, acquired by Arigna, detail innovations in radio frequency amplifiers and circuits – a technological battleground where giants clash.

A Pattern of Confrontation and Resolution

Arigna’s legal maneuvers extend beyond Apple, having previously locked horns with Samsung over the same allegations, leading to an out-of-court settlement last June. This pattern of accusation and resolution also encompasses disputes with other tech behemoths like Google and TCL Technology.

Patent Biz Drops WDTX Case Against Apple : Academic Origins Cast a Shadow

The plot thickens with a revelation from the Patent Trial and Appeal Board. A ruling, just over a month ago, suggested that the language in some of Arigna’s patent claims mirrored a 1997 academic paper by Korean researcher Kye-Ik Jeon, and a subsequent patent granted to him. This discovery casts new light on the validity of Arigna’s patents.

The Legal Eagles: A Roster of Legal Luminaries

The stage was set with an impressive lineup of legal minds. Representing Arigna were Charles L. Ainsworth and Robert C. Bunt of Parker Bunt & Ainsworth PC, alongside a formidable team from Susman Godfrey LLP. Apple’s defense was marshaled by John M. Guaragna of DLA Piper and a squadron of experts from Fish & Richardson PC, supplemented by Elizabeth R. Moulton of Orrick Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP.