Florida Attorney’s Daring Dual Role Sparks Legal Duel
In a legal spectacle that could rival a high-stakes courtroom drama, former Miami office leader of The Killino Firm PC, Dawn Jayma, has launched a strategic counterattack against the firm’s counterclaim and affirmative defenses. Jayma, who doubled as a litigation fee expert, passionately asserts that her side gig wasn’t a case of “self-dealing.”
Philly Atty side gig claims:The Allegations Unveiled
Jayma, now residing in Florida, initiated the legal tussle in her home state against The Killino Firm PC. However, the firm swiftly escalated the battle by removing the case to federal court, just days before filing a robust counterclaim. Jayma alleges that the firm’s failure to fulfill oral compensation promises cost her substantial income, coupled with the fraudulent use of her name and bar information post-resignation.
The Counterattack
Unyielding in her defense, Jayma categorically denies the firm’s counterclaims of breach of fiduciary duty and unjust enrichment, dismissing them as “vague and legally insufficient.” She contends that the firm cannot demonstrate negligence in her handling of any case and challenges the conflation of duties.
Philly Atty side gig claims: A Bold Move
Jayma, having forsaken a lucrative executive role with an insurance company, claims she embraced the firm’s offer of full-time employment with promises of compensation in the “millions.” She underscores her commitment by highlighting the slowdown in her side business as a litigation expert to prioritize Killino’s clients.
Challenging the Allegations
In a legal masterstroke, Jayma rebuts the allegations of self-dealing, arguing that her expertise did not compete with the firm nor did it cause any damage. She emphasizes that engaging in litigation fee expert cases does not equate to self-dealing, as no evidence suggests diversion of benefits from the firm.
Separate Front: Jayma Strikes Back
Not content with a mere defense, Jayma launches a separate motion to strike the firm’s affirmative defenses, denouncing them as “vague, irrelevant, immaterial” and “bare-bones conclusory.” She challenges the lack of factual support for claims of breaching fiduciary duty and unjust enrichment, pushing for a more defined statement or outright striking of the defenses.
Philly Atty side gig claims: The Unfolding Drama
As the legal saga unfolds in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida, Jayma’s bold maneuvers underscore the complex interplay of legal strategy and personal ambition, creating a courtroom narrative that promises riveting twists and turns.
