Accusations of Bias
In the ongoing criminal fraud jury trial involving former Autonomy CEO Michael Lynch, defense attorneys have voiced concerns about potential bias from the presiding judge. A partner from Steptoe LLP, representing Lynch, has criticized the judge for comments made to the jury, which they perceive as unfairly one-sided against their client.
Autonomy CEO’s Atty Says Judge ‘One-Sided’ Against Client: Background of the Case
The charges against Lynch and Autonomy Corp.’s former VP of finance, Stephen Chamberlain, stem from HP Inc.’s acquisition of Autonomy in October 2011 for $11.7 billion. The prosecution alleges that the executives significantly inflated the company’s value through dubious means, including premature revenue recognition and undisclosed sales practices.
The trial, which started on March 18, is set against a backdrop of high stakes and high-profile legal maneuvers, and is expected to continue until June.
Autonomy CEO’s Atty Says Judge ‘One-Sided’ Against Client: Contentious Judicial Remarks
During a recent session, Celeste Koeleveld of Clifford Chance LLP questioned a witness about Autonomy’s dealings, prompting U.S. District Judge Charles Breyer to express confusion over the direction of the cross-examination. This interaction culminated in a 40-minute discourse that left the defense questioning the impartiality of the judge’s remarks.