The startling revelation and lack of initial disclosure that followed retired Lt. General Mike Flynn’s resignation as the Head of the NSA only underscore how little we know about our military leaders when they leave their service armed with vast knowledge of our American defense systems and policy. Their ability to influence policy makers and affect American foreign policy is still very strong upon their retirement, making any work they do for foreign governments somewhat frightening. Flynn’s work involved advocacy for a foreign government, something that should be an obvious disqualifier for any man about to become the head one of the nation’s most powerful intelligence agencies and a practice that should be altogether banned for retired Admirals and Generals.
Members of congress have long ignored the obvious conflicts of interests between the relationships of Generals and the industries with which the military does business, especially after their service ends. Perhaps Congressmen and women know better than to call out these generals for the very practice they themselves perform time and time again in their retirement. However, it is high time Congress act on this issue as the danger of the revolving door of the military is a far greater risk to America and its security than any member of Congress cashing in on his or her service.
